Perpetual Motion
One might ask: Why experiment with a gravity wheel? It would be considered perpetual motion which is indeed impossible? Could magnet designs be a better prospect? Magnets have (2) forces, attract and repel. Would gravity be considered to have (2) forces? Of course!! Gravity has a force on mass that pulls downward and that same force resists the mass being lifted upward. So one could say, gravity and magnets have simular force properties. The magnets force act on iron, while gravity forces act on any type of mass, including the magnet itself!! Would it not be easier to experiment with just gravity forces? Of course we do both here, but gravity is better defined and easier to work with for experimental purposes in my opinion. It is important that one watches the center of gravity in a wheel closely. I can easily spot flaws in other designs by using this method. Most try to make the wheel do something that it does not want to do. You can only do that with a outside power source. You must work with the wheel and encourage what move it wishes to make next. Everyone seems to miss that point. I do not criticize anyone for trying to build a gravity wheel, but they must abide by this one rule. The center of gravity must constantly change in the wheel(s) favor for it to do work using attraction of any kind. This means a constant unbalance must be sustained at the center of any wheel naturally. Most try to get the unbalance from outside in using a more aggressive manner. Working with nature is easier than working against it. Why paddle up stream when it is much easier to drift with the current?
|
